84mm yes, 85mm no. Why not just use 83.50mm? Wiseco make 84mm. Iapel also make pistons. The problem with all of them, although I haven't seen a Wossner piston, is that they don't centre the conrod like the standard piston does. This means you still have some machining work to do if you're going to rebuild your engine correctly. This involves machining the inside of the piston flat and making thrust washers to control the side float.
http://www.taylor-eng.com/images/pistons/c...ust_washers.jpgI'm rebuilding two 1.9 engines at present with 83.50 Iapel pistons. They have very deep valve reliefs that would accommodate huge cams. Unfornutately, this is detrimental as it comprises CR. If installed in a std. block/liner, they're only 10.8:1. I decked the block/liners to achieve zero deck height and bring it up to 11.25:1.
The pistons I designed for Wiseco a few years ago are much better in this respect. They have shallow reliefs, a touch deeper than standard, which means you can control the CR and valve/piston clearance as required. The part number for these:
83.50mm 10686-5216 (0.150" Intake Depth - gives 0.195" total valve/piston clearance)
84.00mm 10686-9295 (can't recall the Intake Depth)
Maximum safe lift on the standard piston is 0.110" lift @TDC (assuming 0.080" safe limit)
Catcams make a good replacement spring, but you need to shim it up slightly if you don't use their retainers. (contact QEP)
Yes, you can convert the standard lifter to solid. Or, buy new ones from Arrow.
http://www.taylor-eng.com/images/pistons/i...iston_liner.jpg