Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Mi16 1.9 Gearbox On Mi16 2.0 Engine
405Mi16.com Forum > Technical Forums > Engine & Gearbox - Performance Upgrades
scoop
is it possible that the mi16 1.9 gearbox gives better acceleration on the mi16 2.0 engine due to wider gear ratio??
Jer309GTi
They are the same ratios as far as I know...
scoop
QUOTE (Jer309GTi @ Jan 29 2010, 10:01 PM) *
They are the same ratios as far as I know...

well, the 2nd gear on the 1.9 gearbox reaches 100 km but on the 2.0 gearbox it reaches 90 km so what do u think??
rodionski
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 29 2010, 08:30 PM) *
QUOTE (Jer309GTi @ Jan 29 2010, 10:01 PM) *
They are the same ratios as far as I know...

well, the 2nd gear on the 1.9 gearbox reaches 100 km but on the 2.0 gearbox it reaches 90 km so what do u think??


that's silly. the 2nd gear in the 1.9 mi16 box does NOT reach 100kmh at all. not above 96kmh at the most. the boxes are the same ratio wise
scoop
QUOTE (rodionski @ Jan 30 2010, 11:44 AM) *
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 29 2010, 08:30 PM) *
QUOTE (Jer309GTi @ Jan 29 2010, 10:01 PM) *
They are the same ratios as far as I know...

well, the 2nd gear on the 1.9 gearbox reaches 100 km but on the 2.0 gearbox it reaches 90 km so what do u think??


that's silly. the 2nd gear in the 1.9 mi16 box does NOT reach 100kmh at all. not above 96kmh at the most. the boxes are the same ratio wise

well to proof click this link and u will see ur self http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA_gfkMy-lU...feature=related for the 1.9 mi16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rr9o2eX8jE...feature=related for the 2.0 mi16
rodionski
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 30 2010, 01:34 PM) *
QUOTE (rodionski @ Jan 30 2010, 11:44 AM) *
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 29 2010, 08:30 PM) *
QUOTE (Jer309GTi @ Jan 29 2010, 10:01 PM) *
They are the same ratios as far as I know...

well, the 2nd gear on the 1.9 gearbox reaches 100 km but on the 2.0 gearbox it reaches 90 km so what do u think??


that's silly. the 2nd gear in the 1.9 mi16 box does NOT reach 100kmh at all. not above 96kmh at the most. the boxes are the same ratio wise

well to proof click this link and u will see ur self http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA_gfkMy-lU...feature=related for the 1.9 mi16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rr9o2eX8jE...feature=related for the 2.0 mi16


i need no "proof" as i happen to own a stock 1.9 mi16 and i happen to have both studied loads of tech info on this car as well as field tested it myself a number of times. all your video shows is that the plastic gear drived by the shaft is worn or the speedo is worn, both would result in producing wrong reading.

just check the gear ratios for the mi16 BE1 (1.9) and mi16 BE3 (2.0) gearboxes from any reputable tech spec data sheet. then you will see for yourself.
scoop
QUOTE (rodionski @ Jan 30 2010, 03:42 PM) *
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 30 2010, 01:34 PM) *
QUOTE (rodionski @ Jan 30 2010, 11:44 AM) *
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 29 2010, 08:30 PM) *
QUOTE (Jer309GTi @ Jan 29 2010, 10:01 PM) *
They are the same ratios as far as I know...

well, the 2nd gear on the 1.9 gearbox reaches 100 km but on the 2.0 gearbox it reaches 90 km so what do u think??


that's silly. the 2nd gear in the 1.9 mi16 box does NOT reach 100kmh at all. not above 96kmh at the most. the boxes are the same ratio wise

well to proof click this link and u will see ur self http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA_gfkMy-lU...feature=related for the 1.9 mi16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rr9o2eX8jE...feature=related for the 2.0 mi16


i need no "proof" as i happen to own a stock 1.9 mi16 and i happen to have both studied loads of tech info on this car as well as field tested it myself a number of times. all your video shows is that the plastic gear drived by the shaft is worn or the speedo is worn, both would result in producing wrong reading.

just check the gear ratios for the mi16 BE1 (1.9) and mi16 BE3 (2.0) gearboxes from any reputable tech spec data sheet. then you will see for yourself.

well how about the sti 2.0 8v gearbox??
rodionski
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 30 2010, 02:32 PM) *
QUOTE (rodionski @ Jan 30 2010, 03:42 PM) *
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 30 2010, 01:34 PM) *
QUOTE (rodionski @ Jan 30 2010, 11:44 AM) *
QUOTE (scoop @ Jan 29 2010, 08:30 PM) *
QUOTE (Jer309GTi @ Jan 29 2010, 10:01 PM) *
They are the same ratios as far as I know...

well, the 2nd gear on the 1.9 gearbox reaches 100 km but on the 2.0 gearbox it reaches 90 km so what do u think??


that's silly. the 2nd gear in the 1.9 mi16 box does NOT reach 100kmh at all. not above 96kmh at the most. the boxes are the same ratio wise

well to proof click this link and u will see ur self http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA_gfkMy-lU...feature=related for the 1.9 mi16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rr9o2eX8jE...feature=related for the 2.0 mi16


i need no "proof" as i happen to own a stock 1.9 mi16 and i happen to have both studied loads of tech info on this car as well as field tested it myself a number of times. all your video shows is that the plastic gear drived by the shaft is worn or the speedo is worn, both would result in producing wrong reading.

just check the gear ratios for the mi16 BE1 (1.9) and mi16 BE3 (2.0) gearboxes from any reputable tech spec data sheet. then you will see for yourself.

well how about the sti 2.0 8v gearbox??


sorry, can't say anything about that one..
KRISKARRERA
STi box has longer ratios, that's not going to help acceleration.
B1ack_Mi16
1.9 Mi16 box maxes out at 96-97 kph at revlimit, tested a lot in earlier years smile.gif

However just rev the engine to 8500rpm and you'll do over 100 no problems biggrin.gif
petert
The STi and other non Mi boxes run the same wide ratios as the Mi16 but with the longer 4.06 cwp. If you want more acceleration fit 3, 4 and 5 from a 205 GTi box. All 2nd gears have the same ratio.
scoop
QUOTE (petert @ Jan 31 2010, 03:31 AM) *
The STi and other non Mi boxes run the same wide ratios as the Mi16 but with the longer 4.06 cwp. If you want more acceleration fit 3, 4 and 5 from a 205 GTi box. All 2nd gears have the same ratio.

thanks alot for ur help smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.